![]() ![]() Of course, many of us felt mislead by the extension feature and falsely anticipated non-destructive extension editing much like how PS CC can create Special Objects from the plugins. Dam wise, Photos really is for the beginning iphone shooter and maybe it's acceptable to more advanced iPhone shooters.Īpple claims that Photos has some advance features like advanced adjustments, extensions and raw support. i can do these from the Photos' Extension thanks to External Editors for Photos app. Photos speculatively appeared to have been willfully developed to be difficult for us to use.Įditing wise, i could do any photo adjustments, multi-images composition, rastor paint/draw, vector drawings, frequency domain editing. Ya, Photos is one of the challenging photos app i have ever used. Would also be great to have user-created Stacks too since Apple already has it for Bursts. Photos does import xml sidecars or gpx files so i figured out solution to geotag my RAWS with Geotagr or GPS watch. However, i do have a few issues that prevent me from migrating. ![]() for doing color, b&w, filter adjustements, i think Nik Collection is way better than any raw editor/dam on the market. if i need any more i use an app called External Editors For Photos ($0.99 at Mac App Store) that will allow me to use Nik Collection to do more advanced adjustments. i can do all the global adjustments of Lightroom in using native Photos adjustements. I know i will eventually migrate to Photos because i want to be on one system that is native to iOS. It's obviously impractical if you have huge libraries or anything less than an epic internet connection. It is, to-date, the only way to “merge” libraries. primary library that iCloud syncs to), and let that sync to iCloud. I've never tried this, but the theory is that you sync your ENTIRE Photos library to iCloud… convert the Aperture library to Photos and make it the “System Photos Library” (i.e. The other alternative would be to move everything from Photos into Aperture (no automation simply be exporting and reimporting images), then migrate that larger Aperture library back to Photos.įinally, there is one option that could work if you have a large enough iCloud Photo Library account. In the meantime if you want to migrate to Photos, you will have to maintain two separate libraries. This is something we can only hope Apple adds. Photos offers no import of library, nor merge library feature. The good news is that you can migrate your Aperture library to Photos and you won't lose any work you've done, but you also won't be able to continue to edit where you left off in the case of any editing feature that doesn't exist in Photos but did in Aperture.īut here's the bad news - there's no good way to import an Aperture library into an existing Photos library. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |